Kyrgyzstan vs Malaysia: 5-bank asset concentration
Kyrgyzstan
68.77
in 2021
Malaysia
70.12
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
122nd
Malaysia rank
119th
5-bank asset concentration over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 70.12 against 68.77 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.35.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 122nd and Malaysia ranks 119th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.38 | 93.38 | 5 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 78.6 | 67.24 | 11.36 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 67.54 | 69.57 | 2.03 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 5-bank asset concentration, Kyrgyzstan or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 70.12 against 68.77 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in 5-bank asset concentration between Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia?
- 1.35, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia rank globally for 5-bank asset concentration?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 122nd and Malaysia ranks 119th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as 5-bank asset concentration. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. (Sum(data2025) for five largest banks in Bankscope) / (Sum(data2025) for all banks in Bankscope). Only reported if number of banks in Bankscope is 5 or more. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.