China vs Malaysia: Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C)
Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C) over time
- China
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 108.69 against 100 in China, a difference of 8.69.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Malaysia ahead.
China ranks 36th and Malaysia ranks 33rd of 47 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 93.86 | 6.14 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher announcing and explaining the policy stance (c), China or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 108.69 against 100 in China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in announcing and explaining the policy stance (c) between China and Malaysia?
- 8.69, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do China and Malaysia rank globally for announcing and explaining the policy stance (c)?
- China ranks 36th and Malaysia ranks 33rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).