Ghana vs Iceland: Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C)
Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C) over time
- Ghana
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 158.14 against 145.5 in Ghana, a difference of 12.64.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 15th and Iceland ranks 13th of 47 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 117.98 | 158.14 | 40.17 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher announcing and explaining the policy stance (c), Ghana or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 158.14 against 145.5 in Ghana as of 2018.
- What is the difference in announcing and explaining the policy stance (c) between Ghana and Iceland?
- 12.64, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Iceland?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Ghana and Iceland rank globally for announcing and explaining the policy stance (c)?
- Ghana ranks 15th and Iceland ranks 13th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).