Moldova vs Uruguay: Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C)
Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C) over time
- Moldova
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 128.4 against 123.16 in Moldova, a difference of 5.24.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uruguay ahead.
Moldova ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 126.73 | 118.94 | 7.79 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher announcing and explaining the policy stance (c), Moldova or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 128.4 against 123.16 in Moldova as of 2018.
- What is the difference in announcing and explaining the policy stance (c) between Moldova and Uruguay?
- 5.24, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Moldova and Uruguay rank globally for announcing and explaining the policy stance (c)?
- Moldova ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).