New Zealand vs Uruguay: Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C)
Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C) over time
- New Zealand
- Uruguay
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 128.4 against 128.4 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 99.23 | 118.94 | 19.7 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher announcing and explaining the policy stance (c), New Zealand or Uruguay?
- New Zealand, at 128.4 against 128.4 in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in announcing and explaining the policy stance (c) between New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for announcing and explaining the policy stance (c)?
- New Zealand ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Announcing and Explaining the Policy Stance (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).