Cameroon vs Montenegro: Assets, International Liquidity, Claims on Nonresidents (ODCS) (US)
Cameroon
19.68 % change on previous year
in 2019
Montenegro
18.73 % change on previous year
in 2025
Cameroon rank
53rd
Montenegro rank
56th
Assets, International Liquidity, Claims on Nonresidents (ODCS) (US) over time
- Cameroon
- Montenegro
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 19.68 % change on previous year against 18.73 % change on previous year in Montenegro, a difference of 0.95 % change on previous year.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 53rd and Montenegro ranks 56th of 174 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher assets, international liquidity, claims on nonresidents (odcs) (us), Cameroon or Montenegro?
- Cameroon, at 19.68 % change on previous year against 18.73 % change on previous year in Montenegro as of 2019.
- What is the difference in assets, international liquidity, claims on nonresidents (odcs) (us) between Cameroon and Montenegro?
- 0.95 % change on previous year, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Montenegro rank globally for assets, international liquidity, claims on nonresidents (odcs) (us)?
- Cameroon ranks 53rd and Montenegro ranks 56th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Assets, International Liquidity, Claims on Nonresidents (ODCS) (US dollar), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Assets, International Liquidity, Claims on Nonresidents (ODCS) (US dollar). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.