Peru vs East Timor: Bank branches per 100,000 adults
Peru
6
in 2020
East Timor
5.64
in 2020
Peru rank
137th
East Timor rank
138th
Bank branches per 100,000 adults over time
- Peru
- East Timor
How they compare
Peru currently reports 6 against 5.64 in East Timor, a difference of 0.36.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 137th and East Timor ranks 138th of 185 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.3 | 1.77 | 3.53 | Peru |
| 2010s | 7.59 | 4.66 | 2.93 | Peru |
| 2020s | 6 | 5.64 | 0.3573 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank branches per 100,000 adults, Peru or East Timor?
- Peru, at 6 against 5.64 in East Timor as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank branches per 100,000 adults between Peru and East Timor?
- 0.36, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and East Timor?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Peru and East Timor rank globally for bank branches per 100,000 adults?
- Peru ranks 137th and East Timor ranks 138th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Access Survey (FAS), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank branches per 100,000 adults. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
For each country calculated as: 100,000*reported number of depositors/adult population in the reporting country.