Bhutan vs Hong Kong, China: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Bhutan
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 7.9% against 7.9% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 99th and Hong Kong, China ranks 97th of 147 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.6% | 9.2% | 3.3% | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 8.4% | 0.2% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Bhutan or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 7.9% against 7.9% in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Bhutan and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Hong Kong, China?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Hong Kong, China rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Bhutan ranks 99th and Hong Kong, China ranks 97th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.