Equatorial Guinea vs Macao: Bank capital to assets ratio (%) (Financial Soundness)
Bank capital to assets ratio (%) (Financial Soundness) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 3.7% against -6.4% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 10.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 147th and Macao ranks 144th of 147 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.3% | 2.8% | 6.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | -1.7% | 3.3% | 5.0% | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Equatorial Guinea or Macao?
- Macao, at 3.7% against -6.4% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Equatorial Guinea and Macao?
- 10.1%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Macao?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Macao rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 147th and Macao ranks 144th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.