Hong Kong, China vs Russian Federation: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 8.1% against 7.9% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 97th and Russian Federation ranks 95th of 147 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.2% | 9.0% | 0.3% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 8.5% | 9.0% | 0.5% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Hong Kong, China or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 8.1% against 7.9% in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Hong Kong, China and Russian Federation?
- 0.2%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Russian Federation?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Russian Federation rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 97th and Russian Federation ranks 95th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.