Republic of Korea vs Lithuania: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Republic of Korea
- Lithuania
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 6.3% against 6.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 123rd and Lithuania ranks 126th of 147 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.9% | 6.7% | 0.2% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 7.2% | 9.1% | 1.9% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 6.6% | 5.4% | 1.2% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Republic of Korea or Lithuania?
- Republic of Korea, at 6.3% against 6.0% in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Republic of Korea and Lithuania?
- 0.3%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Lithuania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Korea and Lithuania rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Republic of Korea ranks 123rd and Lithuania ranks 126th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.