Micronesia, Federated States of vs Sweden: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Sweden
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 5.9% against 5.8% in Sweden, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 132nd and Sweden ranks 133rd of 147 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia, Federated States of averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia, Federated States of | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.2% | 5.6% | 0.6% | Micronesia, Federated States of |
| 2020s | 5.6% | 5.8% | 0.1% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Micronesia, Federated States of or Sweden?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 5.9% against 5.8% in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Micronesia, Federated States of and Sweden?
- 0.1%, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Sweden?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Sweden rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 132nd and Sweden ranks 133rd of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.