Namibia vs Thailand: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Namibia
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 11.1% against 11.1% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Thailand ahead.
Namibia ranks 44th and Thailand ranks 42nd of 146 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.9% | 9.5% | 0.6% | Thailand |
| 2020s | 9.9% | 10.8% | 0.9% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Namibia or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 11.1% against 11.1% in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Namibia and Thailand?
- 0.0%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Thailand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Thailand rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Namibia ranks 44th and Thailand ranks 42nd of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.