Papua New Guinea vs Tanzania: Bank capital to assets ratio (%) (Financial Soundness)
Bank capital to assets ratio (%) (Financial Soundness) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 12.5% against 12.3% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 25th and Tanzania ranks 23rd of 147 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.5% | 11.1% | 1.4% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 12.4% | 12.3% | 0.1% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Papua New Guinea or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 12.5% against 12.3% in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Papua New Guinea and Tanzania?
- 0.2%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Tanzania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Tanzania rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 25th and Tanzania ranks 23rd of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.