Russian Federation vs Singapore: Bank capital to assets ratio
Bank capital to assets ratio over time
- Russian Federation
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 8.2% against 8.1% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 95th and Singapore ranks 92nd of 147 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.7% | 8.5% | 2.3% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 9.1% | 8.3% | 0.9% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank capital to assets ratio, Russian Federation or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 8.2% against 8.1% in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in bank capital to assets ratio between Russian Federation and Singapore?
- 0.1%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Singapore?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Singapore rank globally for bank capital to assets ratio?
- Russian Federation ranks 95th and Singapore ranks 92nd of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank capital to assets ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator is a measure of capital adequacy that evaluates the financial strength of deposit takers by comparing Tier 1 capital to total assets. Tier 1 capital, often referred to as core capital, includes the most stable and readily available forms of capital, such as common equity, disclosed reserves, retained earnings, and certain other instruments that meet regulatory requirements under the Basel framework. This capital is considered the highest quality because it is fully available to cover losses and does not need to be repaid.