Chile vs Malaysia: Bank concentration
Chile
52.2%
in 2021
Malaysia
53.0%
in 2021
Chile rank
139th
Malaysia rank
137th
Bank concentration over time
- Chile
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 53.0% against 52.2% in Chile, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malaysia ahead.
Chile ranks 139th and Malaysia ranks 137th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2% | 78.8% | 27.6% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 71.7% | 55.3% | 16.4% | Chile |
| 2020s | 52.1% | 52.9% | 0.8% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank concentration, Chile or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 53.0% against 52.2% in Chile as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank concentration between Chile and Malaysia?
- 0.8%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for bank concentration?
- Chile ranks 139th and Malaysia ranks 137th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank concentration (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. (Sum(data2025) for three largest banks in Bankscope) / (Sum(data2025) for all banks in Bankscope). Only reported if number of banks in Bankscope is 3 or more. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.