Chile vs Sri Lanka: Bank cost to income ratio
Chile
45.2%
in 2021
Sri Lanka
43.5%
in 2021
Chile rank
137th
Sri Lanka rank
140th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Chile
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Chile currently reports 45.2% against 43.5% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Chile ranks 137th and Sri Lanka ranks 140th of 169 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 49.0% | 51.8% | 2.7% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 50.8% | 45.9% | 4.9% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Chile or Sri Lanka?
- Chile, at 45.2% against 43.5% in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Chile and Sri Lanka?
- 1.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Chile ranks 137th and Sri Lanka ranks 140th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.