Iceland vs Tunisia: Bank cost to income ratio
Iceland
46.5%
in 2021
Tunisia
46.9%
in 2021
Iceland rank
132nd
Tunisia rank
130th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Iceland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 46.9% against 46.5% in Iceland, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 132nd and Tunisia ranks 130th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.9% | 53.1% | 1.2% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 45.9% | 49.0% | 3.1% | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 49.0% | 45.6% | 3.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Iceland or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 46.9% against 46.5% in Iceland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Iceland and Tunisia?
- 0.4%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Iceland ranks 132nd and Tunisia ranks 130th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.