Jordan vs Zimbabwe: Bank cost to income ratio
Jordan
49.5%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
49.7%
in 2021
Jordan rank
116th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Jordan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 49.7% against 49.5% in Jordan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 169 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.9% | 53.1% | 4.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 48.6% | 67.0% | 18.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 50.1% | 51.4% | 1.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Jordan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 49.7% against 49.5% in Jordan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Jordan and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Jordan and Zimbabwe rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Jordan ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.