Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Bank cost to income ratio
Mauritania
50.2%
in 2020
Zimbabwe
49.7%
in 2021
Mauritania rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Mauritania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 50.2% against 49.7% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mauritania ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 169 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.8% | 81.3% | 22.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 65.8% | 67.0% | 1.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 50.2% | 53.0% | 2.8% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
- Mauritania, at 50.2% against 49.7% in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
- 0.5%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Mauritania ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.