Netherlands vs Chinese Taipei: Bank cost to income ratio
Netherlands
61.2%
in 2021
Chinese Taipei
61.7%
in 2021
Netherlands rank
50th
Chinese Taipei rank
49th
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- Netherlands
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 61.7% against 61.2% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 50th and Chinese Taipei ranks 49th of 169 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 1 and Chinese Taipei in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.2% | 62.9% | 3.7% | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 60.9% | 57.9% | 3.0% | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 61.7% | 61.9% | 0.1% | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, Netherlands or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 61.7% against 61.2% in Netherlands as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between Netherlands and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.5%, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Chinese Taipei?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Netherlands and Chinese Taipei rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- Netherlands ranks 50th and Chinese Taipei ranks 49th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.