San Marino vs Sudan: Bank cost to income ratio
San Marino
85.5%
in 2019
Sudan
91.3%
in 2012
San Marino rank
6th
Sudan rank
3rd
Bank cost to income ratio over time
- San Marino
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 91.3% against 85.5% in San Marino, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times San Marino's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sudan ahead.
San Marino ranks 6th and Sudan ranks 3rd of 169 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, San Marino averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.4% | 71.5% | 17.1% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 123.1% | 85.9% | 37.1% | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank cost to income ratio, San Marino or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 91.3% against 85.5% in San Marino as of 2012.
- What is the difference in bank cost to income ratio between San Marino and Sudan?
- 5.8%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do San Marino and Sudan rank globally for bank cost to income ratio?
- San Marino ranks 6th and Sudan ranks 3rd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank cost to income ratio (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090 / (data2080 + data2085). All Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.