Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Palestine: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 3.4% against 3.2% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Palestine ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 73rd and Palestine ranks 70th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5% | 6.1% | 1.7% | Palestine |
| 2010s | 11.8% | 2.8% | 9.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 5.1% | 3.5% | 1.6% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 3.4% against 3.2% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine?
- 0.2%, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 73rd and Palestine ranks 70th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.