Brunei Darussalam vs Croatia: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Croatia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 2.8% against 2.8% in Croatia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 85th and Croatia ranks 87th of 151 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.7% | 13.7% | 9.1% | Croatia |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 5.9% | 2.6% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Brunei Darussalam or Croatia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 2.8% against 2.8% in Croatia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Brunei Darussalam and Croatia?
- 0.0%, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Croatia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Croatia rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 85th and Croatia ranks 87th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.