Cameroon vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Cameroon
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 12.9% against 11.2% in Sint Maarten (Dutch part), a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 19th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 21st of 151 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.8% | 11.9% | 2.8% | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 14.3% | 11.2% | 3.1% | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Cameroon or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- Cameroon, at 12.9% against 11.2% in Sint Maarten (Dutch part) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Cameroon and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 1.7%, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Cameroon and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Cameroon ranks 19th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 21st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.