Central African Republic vs Lebanon: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Central African Republic
- Lebanon
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 16.2% against 15.2% in Lebanon, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 7th and Lebanon ranks 10th of 151 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Central African Republic or Lebanon?
- Central African Republic, at 16.2% against 15.2% in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Central African Republic and Lebanon?
- 1.0%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Lebanon?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Lebanon rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Central African Republic ranks 7th and Lebanon ranks 10th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.