Central African Republic vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Central African Republic
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 16.2% against 15.8% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 7th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 8th of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.3% | 19.9% | 3.4% | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 15.5% | 21.4% | 5.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Central African Republic or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Central African Republic, at 16.2% against 15.8% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Central African Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.4%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Central African Republic ranks 7th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 8th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.