Comoros vs San Marino: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Comoros
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 14.8% against 14.1% in Comoros, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 14th and San Marino ranks 12th of 151 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.8% | 41.0% | 22.1% | San Marino |
| 2020s | 17.2% | 57.7% | 40.5% | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Comoros or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 14.8% against 14.1% in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Comoros and San Marino?
- 0.7%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and San Marino?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Comoros and San Marino rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Comoros ranks 14th and San Marino ranks 12th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.