Congo vs Lebanon: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Congo
- Lebanon
How they compare
Congo currently reports 15.2% against 15.2% in Lebanon, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Lebanon ahead.
Congo ranks 9th and Lebanon ranks 10th of 151 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Congo or Lebanon?
- Congo, at 15.2% against 15.2% in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Congo and Lebanon?
- 0.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Lebanon?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Lebanon rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Congo ranks 9th and Lebanon ranks 10th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.