Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Congo
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 15.8% against 15.2% in Congo, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Congo ranks 9th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 8th of 151 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.9% | 19.9% | 4.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 17.5% | 21.4% | 3.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Congo or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 15.8% against 15.2% in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.6%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Congo ranks 9th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 8th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.