Curaçao vs Palestine, State of: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Curaçao
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 3.5% against 3.4% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Curaçao has been ahead every year.
Curaçao ranks 68th and Palestine, State of ranks 70th of 151 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.9% | 3.6% | 2.3% | Curaçao |
| 2020s | 5.8% | 3.5% | 2.3% | Curaçao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Curaçao or Palestine, State of?
- Curaçao, at 3.5% against 3.4% in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Curaçao and Palestine, State of?
- 0.1%, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Palestine, State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Curaçao and Palestine, State of rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Curaçao ranks 68th and Palestine, State of ranks 70th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.