Hong Kong, China vs Poland: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 1.6% against 1.6% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 124th and Poland ranks 122nd of 151 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4% | 3.5% | 2.0% | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 4.3% | 3.7% | Poland |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 2.4% | 1.3% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Hong Kong, China or Poland?
- Poland, at 1.6% against 1.6% in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Hong Kong, China and Poland?
- 0.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Poland?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Poland rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 124th and Poland ranks 122nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.