Latvia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Latvia
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 2.5% against 2.5% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 96th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 95th of 151 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.7% | 8.2% | 1.5% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2020s | 2.5% | 5.2% | 2.7% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Latvia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 2.5% against 2.5% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Latvia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Latvia ranks 96th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 95th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.