Maldives vs Pakistan: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Maldives
- Pakistan
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 5.7% against 5.4% in Pakistan, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 38th and Pakistan ranks 41st of 151 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.3% | 10.2% | 3.1% | Maldives |
| 2020s | 10.1% | 6.9% | 3.2% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Maldives or Pakistan?
- Maldives, at 5.7% against 5.4% in Pakistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Maldives and Pakistan?
- 0.3%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Pakistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Maldives and Pakistan rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Maldives ranks 38th and Pakistan ranks 41st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.