Mauritius vs Palestine, State of: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Mauritius
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 3.5% against 3.4% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Mauritius ranks 69th and Palestine, State of ranks 70th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 5.2% | 2.8% | 2.4% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 5.6% | 3.5% | 2.1% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Mauritius or Palestine, State of?
- Mauritius, at 3.5% against 3.4% in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Mauritius and Palestine, State of?
- 0.1%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Palestine, State of rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Mauritius ranks 69th and Palestine, State of ranks 70th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.