Namibia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Namibia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 4.5% against 4.3% in Namibia, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 54th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 51st of 151 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.8% | 7.9% | 5.1% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2020s | 5.7% | 7.3% | 1.6% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Namibia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 4.5% against 4.3% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Namibia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.2%, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Namibia ranks 54th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 51st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.