Russian Federation vs Seychelles: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Russian Federation
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 4.7% against 4.5% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 50th and Seychelles ranks 47th of 151 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.0% | 6.6% | 1.4% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 6.1% | 5.9% | 0.1% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Russian Federation or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 4.7% against 4.5% in Russian Federation as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Russian Federation and Seychelles?
- 0.2%, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Seychelles?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Seychelles rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Russian Federation ranks 50th and Seychelles ranks 47th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.