San Marino vs Ukraine: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- San Marino
- Ukraine
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 14.8% against 13.9% in Ukraine, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ukraine ahead.
San Marino ranks 12th and Ukraine ranks 15th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, San Marino averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.9% | 13.7% | 6.8% | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 41.0% | 32.4% | 8.5% | San Marino |
| 2020s | 37.7% | 32.5% | 5.2% | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, San Marino or Ukraine?
- San Marino, at 14.8% against 13.9% in Ukraine as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between San Marino and Ukraine?
- 0.9%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Ukraine?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do San Marino and Ukraine rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- San Marino ranks 12th and Ukraine ranks 15th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.