Australia vs Belarus: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Australia
17.6%
in 2020
Belarus
17.2%
in 2020
Australia rank
85th
Belarus rank
86th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Australia
- Belarus
How they compare
Australia currently reports 17.6% against 17.2% in Belarus, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Australia ranks 85th and Belarus ranks 86th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.4% | 22.9% | 12.4% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 13.1% | 19.0% | 5.9% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 17.6% | 17.2% | 0.4% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Australia or Belarus?
- Australia, at 17.6% against 17.2% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Australia and Belarus?
- 0.4%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Australia ranks 85th and Belarus ranks 86th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.