Australia vs Georgia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Australia
17.6%
in 2020
Georgia
17.6%
in 2020
Australia rank
85th
Georgia rank
84th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Australia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 17.6% against 17.6% in Australia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 85th and Georgia ranks 84th of 141 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.5% | 25.3% | 14.8% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 13.1% | 17.4% | 4.3% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 17.6% | 17.6% | 0.0% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Australia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 17.6% against 17.6% in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Australia and Georgia?
- 0.0%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Georgia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Georgia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Australia ranks 85th and Georgia ranks 84th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.