Australia vs Mozambique: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Australia
17.6%
in 2020
Mozambique
17.1%
in 2015
Australia rank
85th
Mozambique rank
88th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Australia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Australia currently reports 17.6% against 17.1% in Mozambique, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 85th and Mozambique ranks 88th of 141 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.5% | 14.1% | 3.6% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 12.1% | 16.4% | 4.3% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Australia or Mozambique?
- Australia, at 17.6% against 17.1% in Mozambique as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Australia and Mozambique?
- 0.5%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mozambique?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Mozambique rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Australia ranks 85th and Mozambique ranks 88th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.