Austria vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Austria
19.2%
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina
19.2%
in 2020
Austria rank
62nd
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
61st
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Austria
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 19.2% against 19.2% in Austria, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Austria ranks 62nd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 61st of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 19.6% | 6.3% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 17.3% | 16.6% | 0.6% | Austria |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 19.2% | 0.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Austria or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 19.2% against 19.2% in Austria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Austria ranks 62nd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 61st of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.