Belgium vs South Sudan: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Belgium
20.3%
in 2020
South Sudan
20.2%
in 2015
Belgium rank
43rd
South Sudan rank
45th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Belgium
- South Sudan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 20.3% against 20.2% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 43rd and South Sudan ranks 45th of 141 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Belgium or South Sudan?
- Belgium, at 20.3% against 20.2% in South Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Belgium and South Sudan?
- 0.1%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Belgium and South Sudan rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Belgium ranks 43rd and South Sudan ranks 45th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.