Belgium vs Zambia: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Belgium
20.3%
in 2020
Zambia
20.1%
in 2020
Belgium rank
43rd
Zambia rank
46th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Belgium
- Zambia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 20.3% against 20.1% in Zambia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Belgium ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 46th of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.6% | 23.4% | 4.8% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 20.3% | 20.1% | 0.2% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Belgium or Zambia?
- Belgium, at 20.3% against 20.1% in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Belgium and Zambia?
- 0.2%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Zambia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Zambia rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Belgium ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 46th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.