Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Grenada: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
12.7%
in 2015
Grenada
12.2%
in 2014
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
133rd
Grenada rank
135th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Grenada
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 12.7% against 12.2% in Grenada, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Grenada ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 133rd and Grenada ranks 135th of 141 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 13.8% | 0.5% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 12.4% | 13.2% | 0.9% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Grenada?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 12.7% against 12.2% in Grenada as of 2015.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Grenada?
- 0.5%, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Grenada?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Grenada rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 133rd and Grenada ranks 135th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.