Bolivia vs New Zealand: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Bolivia
12.7%
in 2015
New Zealand
13.5%
in 2015
Bolivia rank
133rd
New Zealand rank
130th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Bolivia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 13.5% against 12.7% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 133rd and New Zealand ranks 130th of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.2% | 11.5% | 1.7% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 12.4% | 12.9% | 0.5% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Bolivia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 13.5% against 12.7% in Bolivia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Bolivia and New Zealand?
- 0.8%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and New Zealand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Bolivia and New Zealand rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Bolivia ranks 133rd and New Zealand ranks 130th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.