Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Fiji: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Bosnia and Herzegovina
19.2%
in 2020
Fiji
19.1%
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
61st
Fiji rank
64th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Fiji
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 19.2% against 19.1% in Fiji, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Fiji ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 61st and Fiji ranks 64th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.1% | 17.5% | 1.4% | Fiji |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 16.4% | 0.2% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 19.1% | 0.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Fiji?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 19.2% against 19.1% in Fiji as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Fiji?
- 0.1%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Fiji?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Fiji rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 61st and Fiji ranks 64th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.