Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Italy: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Bosnia and Herzegovina
19.2%
in 2020
Italy
19.3%
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
61st
Italy rank
58th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 19.3% against 19.2% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 61st and Italy ranks 58th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.6% | 10.8% | 8.8% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 14.5% | 2.2% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 19.3% | 0.1% | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Italy?
- Italy, at 19.3% against 19.2% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy?
- 0.1%, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 61st and Italy ranks 58th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.