Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kenya: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Bosnia and Herzegovina
19.2%
in 2020
Kenya
19.2%
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
61st
Kenya rank
63rd
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kenya
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 19.2% against 19.2% in Kenya, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 61st and Kenya ranks 63rd of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.5% | 17.2% | 2.3% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 19.9% | 3.2% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 19.2% | 0.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kenya?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 19.2% against 19.2% in Kenya as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?
- 0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kenya rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 61st and Kenya ranks 63rd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.