Botswana vs Finland: Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets
Botswana
20.0%
in 2020
Finland
20.0%
in 2020
Botswana rank
47th
Finland rank
48th
Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets over time
- Botswana
- Finland
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 20.0% against 20.0% in Finland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 47th and Finland ranks 48th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.1% | 11.6% | 15.5% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 19.6% | 20.0% | 0.4% | Finland |
| 2020s | 20.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets, Botswana or Finland?
- Botswana, at 20.0% against 20.0% in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets between Botswana and Finland?
- 0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Finland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and Finland rank globally for bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets?
- Botswana ranks 47th and Finland ranks 48th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.